The first attempt at a
theoretical interpretation of acid behaviour was made by Antoine-Laurent
Lavoisier at the end of the 18th century. Lavoisier supposed that all acids
must contain oxygen, and this idea was incorporated in the names used for this
element in the various languages; the English oxygen, from the Greek oxys
(sour) and genna (production); the German Sauerstoff, literally
acid material; and the Russian kislorod, from kislota (acid).
Following the discovery that hydrochloric acid contained no oxygen, Sir
Humphry Davy in about 1815 first recognized that the key element in acids
was hydrogen. Not all substances that contain hydrogen, however, are acids,
and the first really satisfactory definition of an acid was given by Justus
von Liebig of Germany in 1838. According to Liebig, an acid is a compound
containing hydrogen in a form in which it can be replaced by a metal. This
definition held the field for about 50 years and is still considered essentially
correct, though somewhat outmoded. At the time of Liebig's proposal, bases were
still regarded solely as substances that neutralized acids with the production
of salts, and nothing was known about the constitutional features of bases that
enabled them to do this.
The whole subject of
acid-base chemistry acquired a new look and a quantitative aspect with the
advent of the electrolytic
dissociation theory propounded by Wilhelm
Ostwald and Svante
August Arrhenius (both Nobel laureates) in the 1880s. The principal feature
of this theory is that certain compounds, called electrolytes, dissociate in
solution to give ions.
With the development of this theory it was realized that acids are merely those
hydrogen compounds that give rise to hydrogen
ions (H+) in aqueous solution. It was also realized at that time
that there is a correspondence between the degree of acidity of a solution (as
shown by effects on vegetable dyes and other properties) and the concentration
of hydrogen ions in the solution. Correspondingly, basic (or alkaline)
properties could then be associated with the presence of hydroxide
ions (OH-) in aqueous solution, and the neutralization of acids
by bases could be explained in terms of the reaction of these two ions to give
the neutral molecule water (H+ + OH-
H2O).
This led naturally to the simple definition that acids and bases are substances
that give rise, respectively, to hydrogen and hydroxide ions in aqueous
solution. This definition was generally accepted for the next 30 or 40 years. In
purely qualitative terms, it does not offer many advantages over Liebig's
definition of acids, but it does provide a satisfactory definition for bases.
Nevertheless, there is
a great advantage in the definition of acids and bases in terms of hydrogen and
hydroxide ions, and this advantage lies in its quantitative aspects. Because the
concentrations of hydrogen and hydroxide ions in solution can be measured,
notably by determining the electrical
conductivity of the solution (its ability to carry an electrical current), a
quantitative measure of the acidity or alkalinity of the solution is provided.
Moreover, the equations developed to express the relationships between the
various components of reversible reactions can be applied to acid and base
dissociations to give definite values, called dissociation
constants. These constants can be used to characterize the relative
strengths (degrees of dissociation) of acids and bases and, for this reason,
supersede earlier semiquantitative estimates of acid or base strength. As a
result of this approach, a satisfactory quantitative description was given at an
early date of a large mass of experimental observations, a description that
remains essentially unaffected by later developments in definitions of acid-base
reactions.